🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers noted the apparent leak could boost AI companies searching for material to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a third party scraped public metadata and used illicit tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to let AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.